Prehistory of the Far West: Homes of Vanished Peoples. By
L. S. Cressman. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press, 1977.
Bibliography. Illustrations. Index. Maps. Tables. 247 pages. $15.00.
Reviewed by Diane Everett-Barbolla, Instructor of
Anthropology and Archeology, San Diego Mesa College; Director of the Presidio
Entranceway Excavation Project; Co-Director Bancroft Ranch House Excavations
(1974); Archeological Consultant for Hirsch and Company.
Cressman's purpose is three-fold: to assemble existing data
on the prehistoric cultural development of the region between the Rocky
Mountains and the Pacific Coast, to assess the question of priority of
development of coastal and inland regions especially the North Pacific Coast
region, and to evaluate the contributions of linguistic, anthropometric,
genetic and archeological studies to the question of Far West aboriginal
migrations. It is a formidable task and one generally well done. If Cressman has
a bias, it is that the prehistorian should also be a humanist and "seek his
reward in exploration of the psychological characteristics of his people" (pp.
88). The book is personal, nostalgic, and retrospective on a career of nearly
fifty years. This bias occasionally makes Cressman gentle when evaluating his data.
Cressman begins by discussing the functional
interrelationship of environment, biology and culture in determining human
adaptation. From British Columbia to San Diego, Cressman describes the variety
of the land and its geologic history. The chapter is a long, complex, highly
technical review of chronological problems which rightly points out that our
cherished absolute C14 dating system may not be so absolute. Cressman is
uncomfortable with dates older that 15,000 years ago for the peopling of the New
World. He mentions the controversial Texas Street and Scripps Campus sites in
San Diego, Santa Rosa Island, as well as less controversial sites in Mexico,
Idaho and Oregon. He refers in a footnote to the Calico Hills site near Barstow,
and the dating of the Del Mar Man by amino acid racemization. But dates 50,000
years old or older do not appeal to him, and are mentioned only briefly if at all.
Cressman does a good job of reviewing the literature on the
skeletal and genetic characteristics of the people in an effort to reach a
conclusion about the nature of "Indian types" and decides that there is no
"type". He seems to regard such discussion as having little merit due to
fragmentary evidence and more specifically to the fact of their accomplishments.
(pp. 88) What the people did is more important than who they were or what they
looked like. Even linguistic study (glottochronology) is regarded as
"disciplined speculation" and in need of more analysis. All are subordinate to
subsistence and technology. Culture as an adaptive mechanism receives Cressman's
greatest attention and when he describes what the people of the Far West did, he is thorough.
Cressman discusses the desert Region and Southern California
Coast and is generally critical. He rejects the San Dieguito I, II, III,
subdivision, feels the Harris Site is an inadequate type-site, is dubious of the
millingstone criteria used to distinguish La Jolla from San Dieguito, regards
the subdividing of the La Jolla culture into phases of questionable value and
sees the sin of "taxonomic overscrupulousness" (pp. 180) manifest. Anyone who
studies the literature may empathize with this observation.
The question of priority of cultural development and
relations between the Islands and mainland of Southern California leads him to
conclude that both grew out of a common base. But he avoids saying whether that
base is Island or mainland. He opts instead for "coastal" (pgs. 186-187).
Cressman was unaware of current work on San Clemente Island by L. M. Axford of
Mesa College. C14 dates include two over 8,000 (personal communication). These
dates certainly challenge his La Jolla, Santa Barbara, Channel Island sequence
but don't yet resolve the priority question.
Of Cressman's three tasks he is strongest on assembling the
cultural data, uncertain about the coastal-island priority question, and
submissive to his humanistic bias in evaluating the linguistic, anthropometric
and genetic evidences.
The Prehistory of the Far West: Homes of Vanished Peoples
is not designed for classroom use but is a good reference for the early cultural
history of the Far West.